Navigator User Forums
  Transaction Entry
  Multiple distribution columns for charge and deposit flipped

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Multiple distribution columns for charge and deposit flipped
FN_User
Member
posted 01-15-2009 10:51 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for FN_User     Edit/Delete Message
Did you make a change on the MD page? The columns for charge and deposit have flipped. Our normal transaction register has deposit first and then charge and the old MD page matched – now charge comes first followed by deposit. Am I remembering correctly?

IP: Logged

David
Administrator
posted 01-15-2009 10:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for David     Edit/Delete Message
I’d recommend you use Debit and Credit instead of Charge and Deposit. That may be confusing to a beginner, but Debit and Credit make much more sense to accountants.

In accounting, Debit is always on the left and Credit on the right—that’s the definition of debit and credit. See http://www.dwmbeancounter.com/tutorial/DrCrTChart.html and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debit.

To change the terminology in Navigator, select Options | Accounting Terms.

Now for the interesting part:

Say you are paying a phone bill with your checking account using a multiple transaction to post it to two expense accounts.

If you are using debit and credit, debit is on the left in both Transaction Activity and Multiple Distribution. The checking entry is a credit (credit decreases asset). The expense entries are debits (debit increase expense). Everything balances and makes sense.

Now switch to deposit and charge. Deposit (debit) is on the left on the checking Transaction Activity screen. But it appears to be reversed on the Multiple Distribution screen—Charge is on the left! The amounts haven’t moved, only the column names. The reason is that the terms Charge and Deposit don’t mean anything in expense and income accounts. We arbitrarily made an increase in an expense a Charge, which makes some sense. But a Multiple Distribution to an income account has the same headings which is plain confusing. The moral of the story is use debit and credit—not deposit and charge!

- David
FNI Technical Support

[This message has been edited by David (edited 01-15-2009).]

IP: Logged

All times are PT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Home

Copyright 2010 Financial Navigator, Inc.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47e